The brutal video of police murdering George Floyd has inspired unprecedented civil action and protests against police violence. Among the many signs and chants heard around the nation and the world are calls to defund the police.
Some advocate for a complete restructuring of public safety. Others want sharp reductions in police spending with corresponding increases in other public services that support communities harmed by police violence.
An examination of government finance data can inform—but in no way settle—larger debates around policing. Government spending on police is not merely a set of numbers but, rather, the culmination of a long history of policy choices, including many rooted in persistent structural racism.
And spending is far from the only policing issue affected by structural racism. It's not even the only fiscal issue, as we saw with the excessive fines and forfeitures in Ferguson and increased purchasing of military equipment.
There are countless issues, such as punitive policing, that require reforms outside of budgeting.
But police spending reflects what communities pay in exchange for public safety—an exchange that does not keep all communities safe. At the least, spending data can help advocates and policymakers understand reforms' fiscal opportunities and parameters.
- Published by
- Urban Institute
- Issue areas
- Crime and Safety
- Document type
- North America / United States
- Copyright 2020 by Urban Institute. All rights reserved.
- What to read next
- New York, New York: Highlights of the 2019 Bail Reform Law
- Rational and Transparent Bail Decision Making: Moving from a Cash-Based to a Risk-Based Process
- Stop and Frisk's Effect on Crime in New York City
- Linked data add horizontal_rule